Pelosi’s Plan Forbids DOJ from Blocking $1 Billion in Funds from Going to Sanctuary Cities

Pelosi’s 1000+ coronavirus plan includes a provision that forbids the DOJ from blocking $1 billion in funds from going to sanctuary jurisdictions.

Per Pelosi’s Plan:

$1 billion [in Byrne Justice Assistance Grants] to help prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, including for purchasing personal protective equipment. 

Funds are to be distributed under the same requirements, conditions, compliance, and certification as 2016, thus preventing DOJ from blocking any of these funds from going to sanctuary jurisdictions.

Appearing on CNBC Tuesday, Pelosi said she would delay her alternative coronavirus bill and attempt to pass the Senate’s bill.

WATCH:

JusttheNews reports House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that she will attempt to pass the Senate’s coronavirus economic stimulus package – putting aside the alternative, projected $2.5 trillion measure that she proposed.

The California Democrat said she’ll try to pass the Senate’s projected $1.8 trillion measure by unanimous consent, meaning House members can say yes without having to come to Capitol Hill to vote.

“The easiest way to do it is for us to put aside some of our concerns for another day, and get this done,” Pelosi told CNBC. “If it has poison pills in it, and they know certain things are poison pills, then they don’t want unanimous consent – they just want an ideological statement.”

The stimulus package in the GOP-controlled Senate has failed two procedural votes over objections from chamber Democrats. Vice President Pence said Tuesday afternoon during a Fox News town hall that the Senate is close to passing its measure.

Pelosi and House Democrats unveiled their own 1,400-page stimulus plan on Monday evening.

House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) released a report cautioning members against voting remotely at this time but he recommended “unanimous consent and voice votes” as alternatives during the coronavirus pandemic.

“It may be prudent to consider the feasibility of remote voting for certain emergency situations, but that decision should be a multi-committee effort with substantial study and development. This change cannot be implemented overnight, and likely cannot be accomplished in time to address the current crisis,” McGovern said in the report.

“Without complete consensus, which we do not currently have, it would also require us to come back to Washington to vote to change House rules to allow for remote voting. However, there are several other routes the House may take in order to pass legislation addressing COVID-19,” he also wrote.