Kamala Busted Pushing Inaccurate Claim on Mueller…. then Deletes It

Kamala Harris was busted pushing a claim on Robert Mueller that was clearly retracted on her Instagram account and was forced to delete it.

Per DailyCaller, the Washington Post conducted a fact check on claims made during the Mueller hearings Wednesday, but declined to review a single statement made by a Democrat.

Instead, the article, titled “Fact-checking lawmakers’ claims during the Mueller hearings,” focused solely on statements made by Republican lawmakers during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s marathon testimony in front of the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.

WaPo fact checked the following Republicans: Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe, Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, Louisiana Rep. Mike Johnson, Texas Rep. Louis Gohmert, Florida Rep. Greg Steube, and California Rep. Tom McClintock.

The article declined to fact check any Democrats during the hearing, despite there being a wealth of material.

For example, one of the biggest bombshell claims during the House Judiciary hearing was made by California Rep. Ted Lieu, who asserted that Mueller did not charge President Donald Trump with a crime because of an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion stating that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Mueller initially agreed with Lieu, but later corrected himself, explaining, “That is not the correct way to say it.”

Per Breitbart, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) posted a false claim on Wednesday from former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s testimony on Wednesday — only to delete it later.

The claim was that Mueller would have indicted President Donald Trump for obstruction of justice if not for a memorandum by the Office of Legal Counsel that concluded it would be unconstitutional to indict a sitting president.

That claim was contradicted by earlier statements by Attorney General William Barr. Barr said that even if the president could be indicted for obstruction — whether during or after his term in office — it could not be for carrying out duties within the scope of his constitutional duties. Furthermore, he explained, the evidence was simply not good enough to sustain a prosecution for obstruction in the examples where it might conceivably have been brought.

Nevertheless, Democrats, including Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), pushed the idea during Mueller’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee — and Mueller took the bait (transcript via NBC):

Lieu: I believe any reasonable person looking at these facts could conclude that all three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice have been met. And I’d like to ask you the reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?

Mueller: That is correct.

Harris posted an image with the transcript of that exchange.

The idea that the OLC memo was the only reason Trump was not indicted kept Democrats’ hopes alive that there might still be evidence sufficient to sustain a prosecution once he leaves office — or to impeach him.

But later, in his opening statement at the House Intelligence Committee, Mueller had to correct the record:

Mueller: I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I wanted to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu. It was said, and I quote, “you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said in the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

As of Victoria Marshall of Townhall notes, Harris — or, more precisely, her campaign — deleted the Instagram post.