Republican Senator Lindsey Graham recently took action to ensure the passage of a bill he introduced which is geared towards overhauling the US asylum policy, extending the duration of time detention facilities can hold migrants.
The bill also requires unaccompanied Central American minors detained in the US to be returned to their country of origin, and was staunchly opposed by Democrats, who stalled the bill for seven weeks.
After Democrats repeatedly stalled, Graham eventually forced the passage of his Secure and Protect Act, drawing outrage from his Democratic counterparts, to which he fiercely defended his decision.
“I will no longer allow our asylum laws to be exploited by human traffickers, smugglers and cartels,” Graham said in a statement. “Cartels, smugglers, and human traffickers are profiting off immigrants, and helping them take advantage of our broken asylum laws.”
Graham continued, “I will no longer allow the loopholes in our laws to be exploited, I will not aid and abet these horrific practices,” adding, “My bill fixes these problems.”
From The Daily Caller:
In one of the last days leading up the August recess, the Senate Judiciary Committee got into a heated clash over a controversial asylum bill. Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina, refused to delay the bill any longer, after accusing Democrats of withholding a vote for 7-weeks.
The bill, known as the Secure and Protect Act, requires that asylum seekers from Central America apply for asylum outside of the United States before applying here. Graham’s bill also extended the time that migrant families must be kept in detention centers from 20 days to 100 days, in order to help avoid immigration fraud.
The bill will ensure that unaccompanied children migrating from Central America be sent back to their home country after a screening, following the procedure for children entering from Canada and Mexico.
The Judiciary Committee eventually narrowly approved the bill by a 12-10 margin. The panel was short two Democrats in a vote on the bill last week leading Democrats to accused Graham of breaking the rules. “Why even have rules?” Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein asked rhetorically. Vermont Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy reinforced this sentiment saying “if the majority is willing to break any rule in order to report this bill today, there are no rules.”
Graham defended the bill’s passing, claiming he did not violate Senate rules. Graham accused Democrats of intentionally refusing to show up to a hearing on the bill last week, and having delaying its passing for seven weeks.
“Here’s the way I take what you did last week, your saying I really can’t be chairman. After seven weeks of holding my own bill, under this scenario I can’t even pass a bill that I introduced as chairman because two of you won’t show up,” Graham said. “I will work with you as long as I can in good faith, but you are not going to take my job away from me! I take this very personally. I tried my best.”
Graham even called out Leahy directly, who was sitting to his left, saying, “Senator Leahy, you’ve been here a long time. I would never have done this to you.” Leahy responded by saying he was absent, “because a member of my family was being buried.”
Graham immediately offered his condolences, but made clear that he was informed that Democrats would not show up over political reasons.
“I will no longer allow our asylum laws to be exploited by human traffickers, smugglers and cartels,” said Graham in an official statement. “Cartels, smugglers and human traffickers are profiting off immigrants and helping them take advantage of our broken asylum laws. I will no longer allow the loopholes in our laws to be exploited. I will not aid and abet these horrific practices. My bill fixes these problems.”