AOC Calls 5-4 Supreme Court Decision in Favor of Trump on Green Cards “Shameful”

Freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) called a recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision in favor of President Trump “shameful.”

AOC was reacting to a post by Greg Stohr who wrote:

BREAKING: On 5-4 vote, Supreme Court lets Trump administration start enforcing new immigrant wealth test, designed to screen out green card applicants seen as being at risk of becoming “public charges”.

AOC shared the post and added:

This is shameful. America shouldn’t have a wealth test for admission. It’s a place where millions of people are descendants of immigrants who came w nothing & made a life.

The American Dream isn’t a private club with a cover charge – it’s the possibility of remaking your future

President Trump scored a major victory Monday when the Supreme Court sided with him in a 5-4 ruling, allowing a policy that allows the administration to deny green cards to those in need of government aid.

The ruling from the highest court of the land overturned a ruling from a lower court that blocked enforcement.

NBC reports the Supreme Court issued an order Monday allowing the Trump administration to begin enforcing new limits on immigrants who are considered likely to become overly dependent on government benefit programs.

The court voted 5-4. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan said they would have left a lower court ruling in place that blocked enforcement while a legal challenge works its way through the courts.

The Department of Homeland Security announced in August that it would expand the definition of “public charge,” to be applied to people whose immigration to the United States could be denied because of a concern that they would primarily depend on the government for their income.

In the past, that was largely based on an assessment that an immigrant would be dependent upon cash benefits. But the Trump administration proposed to broaden the definition to include noncash benefits, such as Medicaid, supplemental nutrition and federal housing assistance.

Anyone who would be likely to require that broader range of help for more than 12 months in any three-year period would be swept into the expanded definition.